What does AR 735-5 state about the use of hand receipts for property transactions?

The correct choice emphasizes that hand receipts must be utilized for accountability in property transactions. This requirement stems from Army regulations that stress the importance of documentation in maintaining accurate property accountability. Hand receipts serve as a formal acknowledgment of custody and responsibility for government property, ensuring that all items are accounted for and can be tracked.

By requiring hand receipts, AR 735-5 establishes a clear and documented process for the transfer of property, ensuring that both the giver and receiver understand their responsibilities regarding the item’s care and maintenance. The use of hand receipts mitigates the risk of loss or misuse of property and lays down a reliable trail for audit purposes, which is crucial for maintaining compliance with legal and regulatory standards.

The other options do not align with the comprehensive nature of property management required by the Army. For example, stating that hand receipts are optional undermines the systematic approach to property accountability that's necessary for effective management. Additionally, suggesting that hand receipts are only needed for permanent property transfers overlooks the importance of accountability in all transactions, whether permanent or temporary. Lastly, the idea that hand receipts can be signed without details would undermine the very purpose of having such documentation, as thorough records are necessary to track property accurately.