Can civilians in the Army be held accountable for property?

Civilians in the Army can indeed be held accountable for property, particularly depending on their specific roles and the assignments they have regarding that property. This aligns with the principles of property accountability outlined in regulations such as AR 735-5. When civilians are assigned property, whether in a logistical, administrative, or operational capacity, they are expected to exercise due care and responsibility.

This accountability can manifest in various forms, such as a requirement to sign for equipment or materials, and to ensure these items are safeguarded and properly maintained. Moreover, the extent of their responsibility can vary based on their position and duties. Therefore, if a civilian is assigned property as part of their role, they are legally and ethically obligated to account for that property and can face consequences for failure to do so.

The other choices inaccurately suggest a blanket statement about accountability that does not take into consideration the nuances of civilian roles within the Army and the specifics of property assignments.