Can Army property be held by contractors?

Army property can indeed be held by contractors, and it remains classified as Army property during that time. This means that while the contractor may have custody or be using the property for contractual purposes, the ownership and accountability ultimately stay with the Army. Contractors can be involved in various operations, maintenance, or support roles, which requires them to use government property, yet the accountability for that property does not transfer to the contractor. It reinforces the principle that the Army retains responsibility for its property, regardless of who is physically handling it.

This policy ensures that there is a clear delineation of ownership and accountability, which is critical for maintaining accurate property records and ensuring that all equipment is appropriately managed. Furthermore, it helps prevent any potential misappropriation or loss of government resources while allowing for efficient use of those resources through contracted services.