Can a subordinate be held accountable for property released by a commander?

The correct understanding is that a subordinate can indeed be held accountable for property that a commander has released, provided that the subordinate is in control of that property. This means that if a subordinate has physical possession and control over the government property, they become responsible for its care and accountability.

Under AR 735-5, while commanders maintain overall accountability for property under their command, the responsibility and liability can extend to subordinates if they are given control over that property. The principles of property accountability emphasize that responsibility does not solely rest with the commander; individuals who handle or oversee property also share in that responsibility. This ensures a clear line of accountability and encourages proper handling and management of assets across all levels within the military structure.

Thus, option B is accurate because it reflects the guidelines set forth in AR 735-5 regarding property accountability and the roles of both commanders and subordinates.